18 Jun 2025

Changing careers from tech into librarianship

This guest post is by Isabell Seeger, a soon-to-be MLIS graduate with a career background in linguistics and AI. In this blog post, she outlines her motivation for a career change from tech into librarianship - and the surprising parallels and transferable skills from one to the other.

A picture of a woman, white computer text on a purple screen that beings with 'how do large language models work? and a picture of books on shelves
Isabelle Seeger by the author, an artist's illustration of artificial intelligence by Google DeepMind from Pexels and close-up shot of books on a bookshelf by Mikhail Nilov via Pexels

Introduction

A year ago, I was a linguist who worked in AI, building language datasets and evaluating AI model output. Fast forward to now, and I am about to graduate with a MLIS degree from University College Dublin, getting ready for a career that may look very different on paper - but feels surprisingly aligned in practice. In this post, I wanted to share a bit about how I made the switch from tech to librarianship, and why I think this career pivot actually makes a lot of sense.


So, What Does a Linguist Do?


In Tech, my job was “teaching computers how to read and write” - my go-to tagline for parties where “computational linguist” would get polite but slightly confused nods. In practice, this meant creating model training data and running large-scale human evaluations to make sure that language-based AI systems met quality benchmarks and provided value to users. On a platform as large as LinkedIn, my previous employer, this often meant projects and products that were seen and used by millions of people. When I started my job, we were focused on Machine Learning models - now often called “traditional AI”. When ChatGPT came around, my role profile changed to include LLMs (Large Language Models), and we all became prompt engineering experts on the side.


Overall, it’s hard for me to sum up the role of a tech linguist, as we often wore many hats - project manager, technical writer for data annotation guidelines, data wrangler and analyst for data and model insights, and metadata expert for ontology and schema design, to name just a few. Which brings me to the next bit:


Switching to Librarianship


Working in tech gives you a front row seat for the work and money that goes into building AI systems, and just how ubiquitous they are in all our daily lives, whether we are aware of them or not. I always viewed my role as the “human in the loop” - crucial to ensure trust and quality. In the private sector, especially with mounting economic pressures, I slowly felt a noticeable shift from quality to quantity, from care to speed, from human review to “Can we do this with AI instead?” - a fair question to ask (I am not a Luddite - I am just a critical thinker), but more often than not, my inner voice had a resounding “no” as an answer, not always welcome.


A huge part of linguistic work in tech is making information digestible for AI systems, starting from representative data sampling to explicitly adding labels to data that goes into model training. The leap into information architecture is short, and many of my colleagues in similar roles (such as taxonomy) have a librarianship background. I found myself wanting to go the other way, to learn more about the values I associated with librarianship such as equal access to knowledge, and being intentional about the ethics of being an information professional - not just building systems, but thinking holistically about their impact. Surrounded by the questions of what we could do with information, I wanted to ask what we should do with it - and sometimes, if we should at all.


Back to School


As my decision to change careers solidified, I had to make a few decisions. Personally, I wanted to stay in Dublin (why Germans love Ireland is a topic for another post), and was delighted when I found the MLIS degree offered at UCD. In fact, my excited grin when reading the syllabus was probably all the decision-making fuel I needed.


Going back to school after working full-time for 6 years was humbling, but also refreshing. This is my second Master’s degree, and I can say that I approached it with more sincerity and diligence - I knew what I wanted to get out of it, and wanted to learn as much as I could. I organised my reading lists early, took copious notes, attended events, and audited several modules on top of my core curriculum to make the most of the limited time (one year is surprisingly short). I loved being able to organise my time more freely, meeting wonderful new people, and having insightful conversations about topics that mattered to me. It is a very gratifying experience to connect with people who care about similar things, and I deeply value my new friendships and budding professional network.


Computer screen that reads the Serials librarian, a chair a table and a bottle with stickers on it
First-person perspective studying in UCD's James Joyce Library, showing an iPad,
comfy seating, and a water bottle. Picture credit Isabell Seeger 2024. 
Connecting LIS to Tech

Progressing through the curriculum, I realised more and more how transferable many of my tech skills were to the LIS space. Whether it is thinking about metadata for digital libraries, planning quantitative or qualitative research methodologies, or designing literacy instruction programmes - many of my “tech linguist” hats are applicable.


I was pleasantly surprised by the presence of technology-focused modules on the course, and attempts to bring AI to the classroom even in more traditional LIS areas such as cataloging. I strongly believe librarians need to be tech-literate. Using tools does not mean using them uncritically; in fact, I think informed and critical use of tech (be it ChatGPT or social media) is paramount for being a part of today’s society. Especially as librarians, we need to stay ahead of the curve, so we can provide AI and digital literacy instruction to people who need it.


The diverse background of people in my MLIS cohort was something I cherished deeply. I believe this is one of the strengths of the LIS sector - many of us come in through non-traditional pathways, and we can learn so much from each other by sharing our experiences and knowledge. I hope I will be able to bring fresh perspectives into my future roles in librarianship, and continue to be able to draw on previous experience to inform future thinking.


Looking Ahead


So, what kind of librarian do I want to be? As I reflect on my year of learning, I see a few pathways for myself. I want to keep my focus on technical and digital spaces - building a small digital library project was one of my favourite class assignments this year. As is probably no surprise, I am also passionate about AI literacy (here is another class project), and would love to help more people develop AI skills and critical thinking as they engage with tech and AI in their everyday lives.


Learning about the area of Research Data Management within academic librarianship got me really excited - having previously designed, collected, analysed, and stored various datasets in my linguist role, I feel a lot of my experience is applicable to RDM. I also love the idea of supporting research, and being able to contribute to open data and open scholarship.


Additionally, I was lucky to recently complete a 4-week internship in the Research Services team of the TU Dublin library, and I had a wonderful time learning about institutional repositories, research information management, and open research. I think my tech skills lend themselves well to a role in academic librarianship, but I am keeping my eyes and mind open, and am hopeful for my professional future, wherever it will lead me.


Some Takeaways


(Tech) linguists and librarians have a lot in common:

  • We are the human in the loop, making connections from raw data to structured knowledge

  • Many of the technical skills from the tech space are applicable (and desired!) in librarianship - we love a good spreadsheet

  • When you tell people your job title, they have no idea what you do, but they think it sounds really cool. 


If you are a fellow career changer, or have any questions or thoughts, feel free to email me via isabell.seeger@email.de, or connect with me on LinkedIn - old habits die hard!


Posted on Wednesday, June 18, 2025 | Categories:

10 Jun 2025

Libfocus Link-out for June 2025

Welcome to the June edition of the Libfocus link-out, an assemblage of library-related things we have found informative, educational, thought-provoking and insightful on the Web over the past while.

5 images clockwise from top left: Hands holding a flame to red plastic material, two men with dyed hair standing shoulder to shoulder, a building viewed through slatted blinds, a woman with an SFSU tshirt lying on pages, a red circle with an x on it in the middle of a picture of a map system
Images from this month's link-out articles

Setting out a methodological framework for undertaking effective reviews of national prison library services: Design of an inclusive methodology for the Irish Prison Library Review.
This study by Jessica Bates, Jayne Finlay and Susannah Hanlon conducts a a national review of prison library services on the island of Ireland. It identifies that library services in Irish prisons are inconsistently staffed and organised, and the challenge within prison librarianship involves closing the gap between international standards and policies, and the state of provision on the ground. This research will be of interest to those working and wanting to work in prison libraries (see also this piece for additional contextual input).

Google AI Overviews Are Here to Stay.
In College and Research Libraries News, Tessa Withorn writes about the nature of AI-generated overviews Google Search provides and notes that, from her experience, the highest quality of evidence (i.e. peer-reviewed studies) is rarely cited. This is a snappy and informative insight on Google's AI Overviews.

The Symbolic Weight of Yale-NUS’s Discarded Books.
The disposal of thousands of Yale-NUS library books has ignited a profound conversation about institutional memory and the handling of academic legacies. This article by Kimberly Lim & Alden Ho delves into the symbolic implications of such actions and the broader questions they raise.

Behind the Curtain: AI. Automation, and the Looming Threat to Human Knowledge Work.
A thought-provoking exploration of AI's potential to disrupt white-collar professions, this piece delves into the looming challenges and the imperative for proactive strategies to navigate the evolving landscape of knowledge work.

The resilience of open science in times of crisis.
Jeroen Bosman and Jeroen Sondervan provide an overview of five types of threats to open science in Upstream, and also propose a simple resilience framework of how to deal with these threats.

‘AI is already eating its own’: Prompt engineering is quickly going extinct.
Three years into the boom, it looks like AI is reshaping existing jobs more than creating new ones. There might not be many “AI Librarian jobs” emerging (as some of us have thought recently).

The Red List of Endangered Crafts - UK.
Heritage Crafts have released the 2025 Red List of Endangered Crafts in the UK. Many of the crafts involved in traditional book making, design, and decoration feature from endangered to critically so. This report by Mary Lewis and Daniel Carpenter also highlights the support being made available to prolong the life of traditional craft and skills.

Award-Winning San Francisco State University Sustainable Materials Library by SFSU Design to Launch This Summer.
San Francisco State University to launch its Sustainable Materials Library this summer. This Ein Presswire article reports that the Sustainable Materials Library collection contains 5 x 5 samples of sustainable materials, aiming to serve as an inspiration for designers, architects, engineers, artists, creators, and anyone looking to explore materials that prioritize sustainability without compromising functionality.

Bookcited!: A Libraries NI podcast for all things library: SongBooks.
Discover the connections between songs and the books that inspired them with the Songbooks series, which is part of Bookcited!: A Libraries NI podcast for all things library. Explore Wuthering Heights by Kate Bush, Scentless Apprentice by Nirvana inspired by Patrick Suskind's Perfume and many more.

The Ultimate LGBTQ+ Pride Book List.
Celebrate Pride month with these recommended Penguin Random House books by LGBTQ+ authors. This list includes everything from inspirational memoirs to novels examining friendship, love and community.

State of Library Engagement in Climate Communication and Education.
A recent IFLA report looking at how libraries around the world are helping their communities get involved in climate action, and can be used as both an advocacy tool and a roadmap for further developing library work on climate communication and education.

A Guide to Publishing Open Access.
A comprehensive guide produced by Lancaster University Library to publishing Open Access monographs, books and more.

3 Jun 2025

Censorship – some thoughts and current issues for libraries

Guest post by Paraic Elliott, DCU Library.

A useful definition from The Cambridge Dictionary: “The action of preventing part or the whole of a book, film, work of art, document, or other kind of communication from being seen or made available to the public, because it is considered to be offensive or harmful, or because it contains information that someone wishes to keep secret, often for political reasons.” 


Examples of banned books in Ireland

  • Married Love - banned by the Irish Censorship Board for discussing birth control.
  • The Dark - Banned in Ireland for issues related to obscenity.


A list of reasons material may be censored.

  • Religious affiliation or authority – On the Origin of Species, by Charles Darwin, has been supressed and challenged since publication in 1859 due to its discussion of the theory of evolution.
  • Witchcraft – Harry Potter was challenged in many US states due to themes of this nature.
  • Violence or negativity: The Anarchist Cookbook, by William Powell, was banned in 1971 and is still banned in many countries, for fears that it might "promote, incite or instruct in matters of crime or violence."
  • Racial issues -To Kill a Mockingbird, by Harper Lee, has been censored for many years due to the use of racial slurs within the texts.
  • Political influence – In 1958, the Irish Censorship of Publications Board banned the book Borstal Boy because of critiques of Irish republicanism, social attitudes and the Catholic Church.
  • LGBTQ+ Content – The Well of Loneliness, by Radclyffe Hall, was banned from 1928 to 1949 in the UK due to lesbian themes the book presents.


Online/digital censorship

Internet censorship is the practice of prohibiting or suppressing certain online content. When a type of content is censored, it generally becomes illegal and near-impossible to access or view as long as you’re within the jurisdiction of the censoring body. In some instances, publishing censored content is also illegal.

A University of Michigan team used Censored Planet, an automated censorship tracking system launched in 2018, by Assistant Professor of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science Roya Ensafi, to collect more than 21 billion measurements over 20 months in 221 countries. Ensafi’s team found that censorship is increasing in 103 of the countries studied, including unexpected places like Norway, Japan, Italy, India, Israel and Poland—countries which the paper notes are rated as some of the freest in the world by advocacy group Freedom House.


Libraries as centres of potential controversy

AI-generated books - library - mystic from pixabay.com

Censorship a relevant topic today?

Research carried out by the Chartered Institute of Library and Information Professionals (CILIP), the UK’s library and information association, found that a third of librarians had been asked by members of the public to censor or remove books, indicating that such incidents “had increased significantly in recent years”, according to CILLIP’s chief executive, Nick Poole. The most targeted books involve themes of empire, race and LGBTQ+.

In recent years a number of right wing and conspiracy theory fuelled groups have staged protests at numerous Irish libraries. One event was billed as Cork Says No, and was organised by the leaders of Ireland’s newest far-right political party, Ireland First. Among these was a protest against the availability of LGBTQ+ reading materials for children at the library. While the banner and choosing the library as a location made it seem as though this was the central issue, the main speakers focussed on different topics such as climate change and vaccination material.


There are some arguments pro censorship

Advocates argue that censorship may be the only way to protect vulnerable minorities, new ones and old ones alike, from potential harm and violence.

  • Censorship can protect children from unhealthy content.
  • Censorship protects the rights of artists, innovators, and inventors – copyright is a form of censorship.
  • Censorship can limit the impact of identity theft.
  • Censorship can provide another level of security to a country’s profile.
  • Censorship provides us with a vehicle to stop false content.


There are some arguments against censorship

  • It represses one group of people in favour of what the majority wants.
  • It allows people to create a specific narrative in society to call it truth.
  • It prevents an individual from expressing themselves freely.


IFLA states that: Censorship, arguably, runs counter to Article 19 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, which states that: ‘Everyone has the right to freedom of opinion and expression; this right includes freedom to hold opinions without interference and to seek, receive and impart information and ideas through any media and regardless of frontiers.


New guidelines designed for libraries in the UK urge staff to provide materials that “illuminate” different views on controversial topics. This 52-page document, released by the Chartered Institute of Library and Information Professionals (CILIP), states that a “good library” should “encompass controversial issues” and that material should not be rejected solely on the basis that it is considered contentious.

Recommendations for libraries

They recommend that in collection development specifically, attempt to reflect the full range of opinion on controversial topics or the full range of diversity in the national context, basing decisions on what to purchase or license on professional considerations (quality, currency, format, cost, etc.), rather than as limited by political or religious considerations or cultural prejudice.

They suggest libraries make an effort to educate library users on issues of censorship and encourage them to favour and practice freedom of expression and freedom of access to information in their personal and professional lives.

Further recommendations suggest that as much as possible, ensure libraries are able to use technology to preserve freedom of access to information and expression and the ability to communicate freely on the internet. They suggest that institutions support library and information services (and their employees) that are being challenged on issues related to censorship.


Posted on Tuesday, June 03, 2025 | Categories: